<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Higgs limits for ICHEP: The Tevatron gains ground</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dorigo.wordpress.com/2006/08/04/higgs-limits-for-ichep-the-tevatron-gains-ground/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dorigo.wordpress.com/2006/08/04/higgs-limits-for-ichep-the-tevatron-gains-ground/</link>
	<description>private thoughts of a physicist and chessplayer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:50:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Not Even Wrong &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yet More Links</title>
		<link>http://dorigo.wordpress.com/2006/08/04/higgs-limits-for-ichep-the-tevatron-gains-ground/#comment-10871</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Even Wrong &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yet More Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dorigo.wordpress.com/2006/08/04/higgs-limits-for-ichep-the-tevatron-gains-ground/#comment-10871</guid>
		<description>[...] Tommaso Dorigo has some excellent recent postings about new results from the Tevatron on the top quark mass and the search for the Higgs. It looks like the Tevatron&#8217;s best bet for finding the Higgs (or for ruling it out in some mass range above the range already ruled out by LEP) will be if it&#8217;s around 160 GeV. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tommaso Dorigo has some excellent recent postings about new results from the Tevatron on the top quark mass and the search for the Higgs. It looks like the Tevatron&#8217;s best bet for finding the Higgs (or for ruling it out in some mass range above the range already ruled out by LEP) will be if it&#8217;s around 160 GeV. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amanda</title>
		<link>http://dorigo.wordpress.com/2006/08/04/higgs-limits-for-ichep-the-tevatron-gains-ground/#comment-10634</link>
		<dc:creator>amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 05:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dorigo.wordpress.com/2006/08/04/higgs-limits-for-ichep-the-tevatron-gains-ground/#comment-10634</guid>
		<description>Hi, it&#039;s about 2/3 of the way down in the comments on the &quot;Not Even Wrong&quot; discussion at the String Coffee Table,
http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/string/

Towards the end of a long to-and-fro between P Woit and J Distler.
Thanks!
A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, it&#8217;s about 2/3 of the way down in the comments on the &#8220;Not Even Wrong&#8221; discussion at the String Coffee Table,<br />
<a href="http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/string/" rel="nofollow">http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/string/</a></p>
<p>Towards the end of a long to-and-fro between P Woit and J Distler.<br />
Thanks!<br />
A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dorigo</title>
		<link>http://dorigo.wordpress.com/2006/08/04/higgs-limits-for-ichep-the-tevatron-gains-ground/#comment-10631</link>
		<dc:creator>dorigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dorigo.wordpress.com/2006/08/04/higgs-limits-for-ichep-the-tevatron-gains-ground/#comment-10631</guid>
		<description>Hi Amanda,

hmmm... I think this sounds like a misinterpretation of my thought, but I cannot be sure whose is the fault of it until I read J.Distler&#039;s quote. Can you point me to it ?

Cheers,
Tommaso</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amanda,</p>
<p>hmmm&#8230; I think this sounds like a misinterpretation of my thought, but I cannot be sure whose is the fault of it until I read J.Distler&#8217;s quote. Can you point me to it ?</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Tommaso</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amanda</title>
		<link>http://dorigo.wordpress.com/2006/08/04/higgs-limits-for-ichep-the-tevatron-gains-ground/#comment-10620</link>
		<dc:creator>amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dorigo.wordpress.com/2006/08/04/higgs-limits-for-ichep-the-tevatron-gains-ground/#comment-10620</guid>
		<description>Jacques Distler claims that your discussion here means that the discovery of supersymmetry at the LHC is now *more likely*. What do you think about that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacques Distler claims that your discussion here means that the discovery of supersymmetry at the LHC is now *more likely*. What do you think about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
