Misspelled! February 6, 2007
Posted by dorigo in Blogroll, humor, internet, italian blogs, news, personal, physics, science.19 comments
My recent rant about growing old is still hot in the press, and here I am, posting another rant. Maybe I am indeed growing old and bitter.
The fact is, everybody loves to be quoted. In the blogosphere, sure, but even more so if it is in a respected, widely known magazine on scientific divulgation . That is, unless they get your name wrong!
It is TOMMASO! T-o-m-m-a-s-o! There. Not that hard, huh ? Why is it that most English-speaking johns end up writing it down and even speaking it up as Tomasso ?
The fact that Tomasso sounds like Tom-ass-**** only adds insult to injury, of course.
However, if the NS journalist who interviewed me on the phone the other week should happen to read this: please don’t feel bad or apologize… You are only the last of a long list. I have sort of metabolized it, until I saw it written on tens of thousands of printed pages.
Oh well. I guess I will get it over with. That is, until they’ll start misquoting me. For that I retain a reserve of indignation.
PS: thanks to my friend David for bringing it up to my attention, and even writing about it.
Seeing the Encke division February 6, 2007
Posted by dorigo in astronomy, games, internet, italian blogs, personal, science.2 comments
The other night I spent three hours looking at Saturn. The planet is at opposition these days, and if you get the right weather and a still atmosphere, you can see an awful lot of details on this little jewel of a planet.
The seeing (a word that stands for an empirical measurement of the amount of turbulence in the air) was quite good, something that is not so rare in Venice: a fact that compensates for the horrible light pollution around my terrace - which prevents me from even dreaming of observing galaxies.
But of course, years of research and the digital revolution have made it clear to us that the seeing is a quite variable feature of the air column which separates your optical instrument from the celestial bodies you aim it at. So much so that modern-day telescopes now feature adaptive optics to compensate for the Hertz-frequency variations of the deforming effect of the atmosphere.
In fact, it is precisely that advancement that has made it desirable again to build larger and larger telescopes. After the construction of the 200″ mirror of the telescope in Mount Palomar observatory, only russian had gone higher (to 240″), but without adaptive optics those instruments only paid back the investment once or twice a year.
Nowadays, adaptive optics being off-limits for amateurs, web-cams have taken their place. If you film an object and offline select only the best frames, you can reach astounding levels of resolution with little more than home-made equipment.
Anyway. I stared at Saturn with my 16″ dobsonian scope after spending twenty full minutes on the alignment. I am a perfectionist, and by Jove, at the end I had managed to get all those darn photons to meet at one single point! And it paid off: I could push the magnification to 400x, 500x, and even 800x. Saturn was beautiful. The Cassini division ran all the way through the rings around the ball of the planet. Delicate hues of green and gold in the globe allowed to clearly distinguish several nice features, the polar cap, the equatorial zone, and the rings’ shadow.
But the real treat was during a couple of moments of perfect seeing - literally, a couple of seconds in the whole observing session - when I believe I glimpsed the Encke division. This is a feature which is really hard to see with amateur instruments: it lies almost to the edge of the A ring, outside of the Cassini division (see picture above). Its width is of only 500km or so, which translates in an angular size of less than two tenths of an arcsecond. That is beyond the diffraction limit of even a 16″ instrument, were it not for the fact that it is a very dark, line feature on a bright area. Studies indicate that such features can be seen even if they have a width as little as a fourth of the Raileigh limit.
My observation spurred some discussion in a forum of visual observers I contribute to. It transpires that observing the Encke is some sort of a Graal for amateur instruments. Discussions in the internet range from explanations that what people pictured with their instruments is not the Encke but a processing artifact of the stacking procedures, to arguments about whether a given instrument can possibly deliver the view.
Now my goal this month is to replicate the observation -to fortify my belief that I indeed saw that feature. But the weather has to collaborate!
